Hong Liu said

[wan1fgagyp]

's assistant for many years, and columnist. The defendant,polo ralph lauren, Xiaobo Wu, Hong Liu plaintiff. This copyright dispute has spanned nearly a year, a further hearing, Hong Liu v. Wu Xiaobo Wu Jinglian pass - a portrait of Chinese economists, "a book plagiarized his own work, infringement of copyright,????, yesterday (22) re- trial. Wu Xiaobo plagiarism hold water This case is whether this end The two sides dispute whether to clarify things The second trial began in the first instance, more than two months after the Beijing Dongcheng Court,michael kors outlet, but the plaintiff Hong Liu said the gallery, not many people,polo ralph lauren pas cher, even the defendant Wu Xiaobo, I did not show up. Originally scheduled for two days of trial in a single day all over Hong Liu said his original intention has not changed. Hong Liu: Plagiarism should be established, because we later proposed the concept of "holistic plagiarism, the same two text such a comparison. Such allegations to mention 32. Plagiarism, these accusations against Wu Xiaobo published in 2010, "Wu Jinglian pass - an economist portrait. The end of the second instance, Wu Xiaobo,ralph lauren, I refused an interview with reporters, his attorney affirmatively expressed its position. Wu Xiaobo attorney Wong: similar to the fact that part exists, not to say that Mr. Wu's point of view or the thematic arrangement of the work is similar, this is no longer. So on our side, of course that is not plagiarism. The problems have yet to digestion, and this controversy is in fact a long time. In May last year, Hong Liu sued Wu Xiaobo and Wu Jinglian pass publisher CITIC Publishing Co., Ltd., the distributor - Wangfujing Bookstore. Over the past year, said Hong Liu, done a great deal to preparatory work, sorted out a lot of evidence of "plagiarism", issued in the courtroom one by one. Hong Liu: There is a chapter structure, we have lawyers here also took out three chapters. Three chapters and the other three chapters of their entire discourse structure. Is in chronological order, such as birth to childhood to youth to youth, though they are in the chronological order of the premise, but inside you select the characters, events, point in time inside the material, choreography and so on. The plaintiffs evidence to enumerate, which can become a powerful proof of the "plagiarism" In the epilogue of the work, Wu Xiaobo there was such a statement, "I refer to in the book Jinglian" and my father and Jinglian part of the contents of the book, thanks to Hong Liu and Wu Xiaolian. "Which the" reference became interesting word, Wu Xiaobo's agent,air jordan, Wong said, in this case, must be noted that the particularity of the biographical works. Wong: The characteristics of the biographical works is we come from the same biographer,burberry pas cher, are also to Mr Wu. But also in the entire biography of the writing process, Mr. Wu was oral, and Mr. Wu also provided a large number of the relevant literature and his life to have seen two of the Hong Liu This does not deny. The more important point,ralph lauren pas cher, Mr. Wu's biography is very serious, so all of his writing of biography will have been carefully Mr. Wu's modified. So in this case, written two biographies with a pass main pass the main modifications may appear similar, but this similarity is a peculiarity of the nonfiction book. From the same person, similar to the fact that inevitably, Intellectual Property Associate Dean of Renmin University of China Guo Wo said that similar cases must first clear copyright protection to "expression". Guo Wo: copyright law it expresses is that the protection of expression rather than to express ideas, the same idea, different expression, then we think it is called plagiarism. However,air jordan pas cher, if the expression of the same so-called plagiarism. The so-called "express" similar to constitute "plagiarism" "This is a very serious trial, the case is worthy of study and debate." Wu Xiaobo's attorney, said Hong Liu of the place of "plagiarism" are, in fact, Hong Liu Hong Liu said in their own personal microblogging "reference." Professor Guo He said, can constitute the "reference" is a basis for judgment,chaussure de foot, intellectual property experts. Wo Guo: For example, you wrote an article, and then I referenced in the article which I wrote you something, so I do not enjoy copyright. Others in reference to my article, he quoted, the statement quoted you instead of me. So I right that part because it is simply not the rights originally referenced, this is the reason there is no problem. Hong Liu I also have their own views. Hong Liu: you refer to what, how reference, this is a wise labor for me, after all, a voluminous literature. In addition, reference to the context of this literature. May be above or below this other side next to in the literature above, below,mercurial, or up and down at the same time and my books inside the place is highly similar,burberry, then the middle of the citation any connection, like me, so this would constitute a whole. The dispute has repeatedly upgraded from the online debate "battle of words" to the court, the trial is all over, the next step is the verdict of the court. After the end of the second instance court on the parties to the recommendations of the "mediation", Hong Liu said, the premise can not be changed. Hong Liu: Any goodwill and sincerity are welcome, the door is wide open. But my principle from beginning to end are the same, that the other party to admit the plagiarism, apology. Defendant Wu Xiaobo's attorney, expressed a contrary view. Wong: If the mediation is to set the premise, I think our side it may be difficult to accept. Whether court mediation reach Shangqie unknown, pronounced before the results, regardless Hong Liu or Wu Xiaobo, expressed through the written word a similar meaning: This is a the efforts made to promote the intellectual property norms.
Related articles:


they do not listen to

you wake up

in violation of the provisions of Article 63